Evita Alonso GI ihuman Case Study
Evaluating and Managing Genitourinary or Gastrointestinal Conditions
Genitourinary conditions, such as urinary frequency, pose challenges for individuals of all ages. This condition may stem from systemic issues like diabetes, urinary tract infections, enlarged prostates, kidney infections, or prostate cancer. These conditions necessitate thorough patient evaluations due to their potentially serious implications. When assessing patients with genitourinary or gastrointestinal concerns, it is crucial to conduct a comprehensive evaluation, taking into account the patient’s personal, medical, and family history. Careful consideration is required before recommending specific physical exams and diagnostic tests, as the benefits of these procedures should outweigh potential risks.
Photo Credit: Crystal light / Adobe Stock
Struggling to meet your deadline?
Get your assignment on Evita Alonso GI ihuman Case Study done by certified MDs and PhDs in the USA. ORDER NOW!
For this Case Study Assignment, you will delve into an i-Human simulation case study focused on an adult patient grappling with a gastrointestinal condition. Drawing insights from the patient’s information, your task involves formulating a comprehensive differential diagnosis, critically evaluating treatment options, and crafting an appropriate treatment plan tailored to the specific needs of the patient.
To prepare:
1. Thoroughly review this week’s Learning Resources, contemplating effective methods for assessing, diagnosing, and treating patients with gastrointestinal or genitourinary conditions.
2. Utilize i-Human, accessible from this week’s Learning Resources, and carefully examine the assigned i-Human case study. Consider the essential components of the health history that should be collected from the patient.
3. Identify appropriate physical exams and diagnostic tests that would yield crucial information about the patient’s condition. Reflect on how the results of these examinations would contribute to making a precise diagnosis.
4. Formulate three to five possible conditions that should be considered in the differential diagnosis for the patient.
5. Contemplate the patient’s ultimate diagnosis and consider clinical guidelines that might substantiate this specific diagnosis.
6. Develop a comprehensive treatment plan for the patient, integrating health promotion and patient education strategies tailored for individuals dealing with gastrointestinal or genitourinary conditions.
Assignment:
Engage with this week’s i-Human patient and complete the assigned case study. For guidance on using i-Human, refer to the i-Human Graduate Programs Help link within the i-Human platform.
By Day 7:
Submit your Assignment in i-Human, ensuring that all aspects of the case study are thoroughly addressed.
Evita Alonso Gastrointestinal i-Human Case Study Assignment: Evaluating and Managing Genitourinary or Gastrointestinal Conditions
Urinary frequency is an example of a genitourinary condition that presents problems for adults across the lifespan. It can be the result of various systemic conditions such as diabetes, urinary tract infections, enlarged prostates, kidney infections, or prostate cancer. Many of these conditions have very serious implications requiring thorough patient evaluations. When evaluating patients, it is essential to carefully assess the patient’s personal, medical, and family history prior to recommending certain physical exams and diagnostic testing, as sometimes the benefits of these exams do not outweigh the risks.
Photo Credit: Crystal light / Adobe Stock
For this Case Study Assignment, you will analyze an i-Human simulation case study about an adult patient with a gastrointestinal condition. Based on the patient’s information, you will formulate a differential diagnosis, evaluate treatment options, and then create an appropriate treatment plan for the patient.
To prepare:
- Review this week’s Learning Resources. Consider how to assess, diagnose, and treat patients with GI or GU conditions.
- Access i-Human from this week’s Learning Resources and review this week’s i-Human case study. Based on the provided patient information, think about the health history you would need to collect from the patient.
- Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. Reflect on how the results would be used to make a diagnosis.
- Identify three to five possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient.
- Consider the patient’s diagnosis. Think about clinical guidelines that might support this diagnosis.
- Develop a treatment plan for the patient that includes health promotion and patient education strategies for patients with GI or GU conditions.
Assignment
As you interact with this week’s i-Human patient, complete the assigned case study. For guidance on using i-Human, refer to the i-Human Graduate Programs Help link within the i-Human platform.
By Day 7
Complete your Assignment in i-Human.
Dont wait until the last minute.
Provide your requirements and let our native nursing writers deliver your assignments ASAP.
| Novice | Competent | Proficient | |
|---|---|---|---|
| HPI statement |
0 (0%) – 5 (5%)
Poorly written HPI statement. Incomplete ideas and sentences. Lacks basic history taking skills
|
6 (6%) – 10 (10%)
Well written HPI statement but may be missing 1-2 key components from the history
|
11 (11%) – 15 (15%)
Clearly written HPI statement with comprehensive information gathering from case questions.
|
| History |
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Incomplete history missing 3 or more aspects of the OLDCARDS critical to patient’s diagnosis.
|
7 (7%) – 8 (8%)
Fairly complete history covering most of the requirements but may be missing 1-2 aspects of OLDCARDS critical to patient’s diagnosis.
|
9 (9%) – 10 (10%)
Complete history covering all critical components of a focus exam. Includes all aspects of OLDCARDS
|
| Physical Exam |
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Incomplete physical examination. May be missing 3 or more key exam findings that are critical to patient’s diagnosis.
|
7 (7%) – 8 (8%)
Fairly complete physical examination but may be missing 1-2 key exam findings critical to patient’s diagnosis.
|
9 (9%) – 10 (10%)
Complete physical examination covering all critical components of a focus exam.
|
| Testing |
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Includes 3 or more inappropriate exams or tests. May include contraindicated testing.
|
7 (7%) – 8 (8%)
Tests ordered are generally apprropriate. May include 1-2 unnecessary exams or tests.
|
9 (9%) – 10 (10%)
Tests that are ordered are appropriate for patient and cost effective.
|
| Differential Diagnosis Summary |
0 (0%) – 9 (9%)
Primary diagnosis may be wrong.Differential diagnosis list too brief and inconclusive. May be missing 3 or more critical components.
|
10 (10%) – 14 (14%)
Correct primary diagnosis identified. Well written differential diagnoses. May be missing 1-2 critical components. Priority list may be out of order
|
15 (15%) – 20 (20%)
Primary diagnosis identified. Clearly written differential diagnoses.
|
| Plan for patient |
0 (0%) – 15 (15%)
Poorly written plan. May be missing 3 or more key issues that are critical to patient’s diagnosis.
|
16 (16%) – 25 (25%)
Well written plan but may be missing 1-2 key issues critical to patient’s diagnosis.
|
26 (26%) – 30 (30%)
Clearly written plan covering all critical components for patient’s final diagnosis.
|
| Exercises |
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Correctly answered 0-69% of the clinical questions.
|
3 (3%) – 4 (4%)
Correctly answered 70-89% of the clinical questions.
|
0 (0%) – 5 (5%)
Correctly answered 90-100% of the clinical questions.
|
| Total Points: 100 |
|---|