NRNP 6665 Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

NRNP 6665 Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

The DSM-5 is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with the content and structure of the DSM-5, and dissociative disorders are one such area. These disorders can be difficult to distinguish and diagnose.
There is also controversy in the field over the legitimacy of certain dissociative disorders, such as dissociative identity disorder, which was formerly called multiple personality disorder.
In this Assignment, you will examine the controversy surrounding dissociative disorders. You will also explore clinical, ethical, and legal considerations pertinent to working with patients with these disorders.

15 Tips to Succeed in Nursing School Finals

Photo Credit: Getty Images/Wavebreak Media

usa nursing papers

Struggling to meet your deadline?

Get your assignment on NRNP 6665 Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders done by certified MDs and PhDs in the USA. ORDER NOW!

To Prepare

 Review this week’s Learning Resources on dissociative disorders.
 Use the Walden Library to investigate the controversy regarding dissociative disorders. Locate at
least three scholarly articles that you can use to support your Assignment.
The Assignment (2–3 pages)
 Explain the controversy that surrounds dissociative disorders.
 Explain your professional beliefs about dissociative disorders, supporting your rationale with at
least three scholarly references from the literature.
 Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present
with a dissociative disorder.
 Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that you need to
bring to your practice and why they are important.

By Day 7 of Week 9
Submit your Assignment.
Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
 Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK9Assgn+last name+first
initial.(extension)” as the name.
 Click the Week 9 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
 Click the Week 9 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from
this area.
 Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document
you saved as “WK9Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
 If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my
paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
 Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria

The DSM-5 is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and
legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with the content and structure of the DSM-5, and dissociative disorders are one such area. These disorders can be difficult to distinguish and diagnose.
There is also controversy in the field over the legitimacy of certain dissociative disorders, such as dissociative identity disorder, which was formerly called multiple personality disorder.
In this Assignment, you will examine the controversy surrounding dissociative disorders. You will also explore clinical, ethical, and legal considerations pertinent to working with patients with these disorders.

Photo Credit: Getty Images/Wavebreak Media

To Prepare

 Review this week’s Learning Resources on dissociative disorders.
 Use the Walden Library to investigate the controversy regarding dissociative disorders. Locate at
least three scholarly articles that you can use to support your Assignment.

The Assignment (2–3 pages)

 Explain the controversy that surrounds dissociative disorders.
 Explain your professional beliefs about dissociative disorders, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature.
 Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.
 Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important.

By Day 7 of Week 9

Submit your Assignment.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
 Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK9Assgn+last name+first
initial.(extension)” as the name.
 Click the Week 9 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
 Click the Week 9 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from
this area.
 Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK9Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
 If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
 Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria

Learning Resources

Required Readings (click to expand/reduce)

Sadock, B. J., Sadock, V. A., & Ruiz, P. (2015). Kaplan & Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry (11th ed.).
Wolters Kluwer.
 Chapter 12, “Dissociative Disorders”

Required Media (click to expand/reduce)

Osmosis. (2017, November 20). Dissociative disorders – causes, symptoms, diagnosis, treatment,
pathology [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/XF2zeOdE5GY

Mad Medicine. (2019, August 18). Dissociative disorders (Psychiatry) – USMLE Step 1 [Video]. YouTube.

Grande, T. (2018, October 22). The dissociative identity disorder controversy (Trauma vs. Iatrogenic).
[Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqTP0CP9aDk

The DSM-5, a diagnostic tool that has evolved over the years, plays a crucial role in not only diagnosing but also in billing, accessing services, and legal cases. However, there is not a unanimous consensus among practitioners regarding the content and structure of the DSM-5, and this controversy extends to dissociative disorders, which are often challenging to distinguish and diagnose. Some practitioners question the legitimacy of certain dissociative disorders, including what was formerly known as multiple personality disorder, now referred to as dissociative identity disorder.

In this assignment, the focus is on exploring the controversies surrounding dissociative disorders, along with considering clinical, ethical, and legal aspects when working with patients who have these disorders.

To prepare for this assignment:

1. Review the learning resources on dissociative disorders for an in-depth understanding of the topic.

2. Use the Walden Library to conduct research into the controversies associated with dissociative disorders. Find at least three scholarly articles that you can use to support your assignment.

The assignment (2-3 pages) should include:

1. An explanation of the controversies surrounding dissociative disorders.

2. Your professional beliefs about dissociative disorders, substantiated by at least three scholarly references from the literature.

3. Strategies for maintaining a therapeutic relationship with a client who may present with a dissociative disorder.

4. An explanation of the ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that need to be considered in your practice, along with an explanation of why they are important.

The assignment should be submitted by Day 7 of Week 9. Follow the submission and grading instructions provided.

NRNP_6665_Week9_Assignment_Rubric
NRNP_6665_Week9_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
In 2–3 pages, address the following:• Explain the controversy that surrounds dissociative disorders. 

 

15 to >13.0 pts

Excellent
The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders.
 

13 to >11.0 pts

Good
The response includes an accurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders.
 

11 to >10.0 pts

Fair
The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders.
 

10 to >0 pts

Poor
The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. Or the response is missing.
15 pts
• Explain your professional beliefs about dissociative disorders, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature. 

 

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent
The response includes a thorough and well-organized explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale demonstrates critical thinking and is strongly supported with three scholarly references.
 

22 to >19.0 pts

Good
The response includes a well-organized explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is clear and appropriately supported with three scholarly references.
 

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair
The response includes a somewhat vague explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is somewhat unclear and references either provide weak support for the rationale or are not scholarly/current.
 

17 to >0 pts

Poor
The response includes a vague explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is unclear and references are inappropriate. Or the response is missing.
25 pts
• Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. 

 

30 to >26.0 pts

Excellent
The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.
 

26 to >23.0 pts

Good
The response includes an accurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.
 

23 to >20.0 pts

Fair
The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.
 

20 to >0 pts

Poor
The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. Or the response is missing.
30 pts
• Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important. 

 

15 to >13.0 pts

Excellent
The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important.
 

13 to >11.0 pts

Good
The response includes an accurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important.
 

11 to >10.0 pts

Fair
The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important.
 

10 to >0 pts

Poor
The response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Or, response is missing.
15 pts
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria. 

 

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.
 

4 to >3.5 pts

Good
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive.
 

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.
 

3 to >0 pts

Poor
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.
5 pts
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation 

 

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors
 

4 to >3.5 pts

Good
Contains one or two grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors
 

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair
Contains three or four grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors
 

3 to >0 pts

Poor
Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding
5 pts
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. 

 

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent
Uses correct APA format with no errors
 

4 to >3.5 pts

Good
Contains one or two APA format errors
 

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair
Contains three or four APA format errors
 

3 to >0 pts

usa nursing papers

Dont wait until the last minute.

Provide your requirements and let our native nursing writers deliver your assignments ASAP.

Poor
Contains many (five or more) APA format errors
5 pts
Total Points: 100

Share your love
WhatsApp Us
www.USANursingPapers.com
Our service is 100% Secure & Confidential.
Native USA experts will write you a Top-quality Nursing Paper from Scratch.

WhatsApp Us, We are Live!