Get 10% Discount On Orders Above $100.Use Coupon Code: OFF10
NRNP 6665 Week 1 Discussion: Comprehensive Integrated Psychiatric Assessment
I appreciate your insightful analysis of the video presentation and the crucial role of comprehensive integrated psychiatric assessments for children and adolescents. I’d like to offer additional perspectives and insights to enrich our discussion.
I concur that safety concerns are of paramount importance and should be meticulously assessed during psychiatric evaluations. In this regard, it’s vital to recognize that evaluating suicide risk is a multifaceted process that extends beyond merely inquiring about suicidal thoughts, plans, and intent. It also encompasses the assessment of protective factors, such as social support and coping skills. Moreover, understanding the broader context of the patient’s life is imperative, including factors such as culture and family dynamics, which can significantly influence suicide risk (Linehan et al., 2015). Thus, incorporating a comprehensive suicide risk assessment tool like the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) can be highly beneficial. This validated tool is suitable for use with children and adolescents (Posner et al., 2011) and provides a structured framework for assessing suicide risk comprehensively.
Struggling to meet your deadline?
Get your assignment on NRNP 6665 Week 1 Discussion: Comprehensive Integrated Psychiatric Assessment done by certified MDs and PhDs in the USA. ORDER NOW!
The Impact of Florence Nightingale on Nursing and Colonialism
Week 1 Discussion: The Significance of Comprehensive Integrated Psychiatric Assessment for Children and Adolescents
While symptom rating scales can be valuable assets in the assessment process, it’s crucial to employ them judiciously and not rely solely on their outcomes for diagnosis. These scales come with inherent limitations, including the potential for both false positives and false negatives. To ensure a more accurate evaluation, it’s essential to interpret the scores in the broader context of the patient’s overall presentation (Hodges et al., 2013). Consequently, a holistic approach to assessment is vital. This includes integrating rating scales as one component of a comprehensive evaluation that encompasses clinical interviews, direct observations, and the collection of collateral information from various sources. Such a multifaceted approach ensures a more accurate and nuanced understanding of the patient’s condition, ultimately leading to improved diagnosis and treatment planning.
References
Roush, Jared F. and O’Brien, Karen M. and Ruha, Allyson L. (2021) Evaluating a Recovery-Oriented Intensive Outpatient Program for Veterans at Risk for Suicide. Crisis 42, 218-224. 10.1027/0227-5910/a000703
Posner, Kelly and Brown, Gregory K. and Stanley, Barbara and Brent, David A. and Yershova, Kseniya V. and Oquendo, Maria A. and Currier, Glenn W. and Melvin, Glenn A. and Greenhill, Laurence and Shen, Sa and Mann, J. John.(2011)
The Columbia–Suicide Severity Rating Scale: Initial Validity and Internal Consistency Findings From Three Multisite Studies With Adolescents and Adults.
10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.10111704
Discussion: Comprehensive Integrated Psychiatric Assessment
Photo Credit: Seventyfour / Adobe Stock
Many assessment principles are the same for children and adults; however, unlike with adults/older adults, where consent for participation in the assessment comes from the actual client, with children it is the parents or guardians who must make the decision for treatment. Issues of confidentiality, privacy, and consent must be addressed. When working with children, it is not only important to be able to connect with the pediatric patient, but also to be able to collaborate effectively with the caregivers, other family members, teachers, and school counselors/psychologists, all of whom will be able to provide important context and details to aid in your assessment and treatment plans.
Some children/adolescents may be more difficult to assess than adults, as they can be less psychologically minded. That is, they have less insights into themselves and their motivations than adults (although this is not universally true). The PMHNP must also take into consideration the child’s culture and environmental context. Additionally, with children/adolescents, there are lower rates of neurocognitive disorders superimposed on other clinical conditions, such as depression or anxiety, which create additional diagnostic challenges.
In this Discussion, you review and critique the techniques and methods of a mental health professional as the practitioner completes a comprehensive, integrated psychiatric assessment of an adolescent. You also identify rating scales and treatment options that are specifically appropriate for children/adolescents.
To Prepare
- Review the Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide on comprehensive, integrated psychiatric assessment. Watch the Mental Status Examination B-6 and Simulation Scenario-Adolescent Risk Assessment videos.
- Watch the YMH Boston Vignette 5 video and take notes; you will use this video as the basis for your Discussion post.
By Day 3 of Week 1
Based on the YMH Boston Vignette 5 video, post answers to the following questions:
- What did the practitioner do well? In what areas can the practitioner improve?
- At this point in the clinical interview, do you have any compelling concerns? If so, what are they?
- What would be your next question, and why?
Then, address the following. Your answers to these prompts do not have to be tailored to the patient in the YMH Boston video.
- Explain why a thorough psychiatric assessment of a child/adolescent is important.
- Describe two different symptom rating scales that would be appropriate to use during the psychiatric assessment of a child/adolescent.
- Describe two psychiatric treatment options for children and adolescents that may not be used when treating adults.
- Explain the role parents/guardians play in assessment.
Support your response with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources and explain why each of your supporting sources is considered scholarly. Attach the PDFs of your sources.
Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses.
By Day 6 of Week 1
Respond to at least two of your colleagues on 2 different days by offering additional insights or alternative perspectives on their analysis of the video, other rating scales that may be used with children, or other treatment options for children not yet mentioned. Be specific and provide a rationale with evidence.
Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and
respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link, and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit!
Dont wait until the last minute.
Provide your requirements and let our native nursing writers deliver your assignments ASAP.