Rubric

NURS_6053_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric
NURS_6053_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
Develop a 2-3 page paper, written to your organization’s leadership team, addressing the selected national healthcare issue/stressor and how it is impacting your work setting. Be sure to address the following: · Describe the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected and its impact on your organization. · Use organizational data to quantify the impact (if necessary, seek assistance from leadership or appropriate stakeholders in your organization). 

 

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent
The response accurately and thoroughly describes the national healthcare issue/stressor selected and its impact on an organization. …The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed evidence/data to quantify the impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor selected.
 

22 to >19.0 pts

Good
The response describes the national healthcare issue/stressor selected and its impact on an organization. …The response includes accurate data to quantify the impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor selected. ANALYSIS OF A PERTINENT HEALTHCARE ISSUE
 

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the national healthcare issue/stressor selected and its impact on an organization. …The response includes vague or inaccurate data to quantify the impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor selected.
 

17 to >0 pts

Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the national healthcare issue/stressor selected and its impact on an organization or is missing. …The response includes vague and inaccurate data to quantify the impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor selected or is missing.
25 pts
· Provide a summary of the two articles you reviewed from outside resources, on the national healthcare issue/stressor. · Explain how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations. 

 

30 to >26.0 pts

Excellent
Response includes a complete, detailed, and specific summary of two outside resources (articles) reviewed on the national healthcare issue/stressor selected. …The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations.
 

26 to >23.0 pts

Good
Response includes an accurate summary of two outside resources (articles) reviewed on the national healthcare issue/stressor selected. …The response explains how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations.
 

23 to >20.0 pts

Fair
Response includes a vague or inaccurate or incomplete summary of outside resources (articles) reviewed on the national healthcare issue/stressor selected. …The response vaguely or inaccurately explains how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations.
 

20 to >0 pts

Poor
Response provides a vague and inaccurate summary of outside resources (articles) reviewed on the national healthcare issue/stressor selected or summary is missing. …The response vaguely and inaccurately explains how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations or explanation is missing.
30 pts
· Summarize the strategies used to address the organizational impact of national healthcare issues/stressors presented in the scholarly resources you selected. · Explain how the strategies may impact your organization both positively and negatively. Be specific and provide examples. 

 

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent
Response includes a complete, detailed, and accurate summary of the strategies used to address the organizational impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor. …Response accurately and thoroughly explains how the strategies may impact an organization both positively and negatively, with specific and accurate examples for each.
 

22 to >19.0 pts

Good
Response includes an accurate summary of the strategies used to address the organizational impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor. …Response explains how the strategies may impact an organization both positively and negatively with at least one specific example for each.
 

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair
Response includes a vague or inaccurate summary of the strategies used to address the organizational impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor. …Response vaguely or inaccurately explains how the strategies may impact an organization both positively and negatively. …Response may include some vague or inaccurate examples.
 

17 to >0 pts

Poor
Response provides a vague and inaccurate summary of the strategies used to address the organizational impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor or summary is missing. …Response vaguely and inaccurately explains how the strategies may impact an organization both positively and negatively or explanation is missing. …Response does not include any examples.
25 pts
Resource Synthesis 

 

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent
Using proper in-text citations, the response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 2 or 3 course-specific resources.
 

4 to >3.0 pts

Good
Using proper in-text citations, the response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 1 course-specific resource.
 

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair
Using proper in-text citations, the response minimally integrates outside and course-specific resources.
 

2 to >0 pts

Poor
The response does not integrate outside and course-specific resources or no in-text citations are used.
5 pts
Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided, which delineates all required criteria. 

 

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. …A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided, which delineates all required criteria.
 

4 to >3.0 pts

Good
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated but are brief and not descriptive.
 

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.
 

2 to >0 pts

Poor
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time. …No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion is provided.
5 pts
Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. 

 

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
 

4 to >3.0 pts

Good
Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
 

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair
Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
 

2 to >0 pts

Poor
Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
5 pts
Written Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. 

 

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
 

4 to >3.0 pts

Good
Contains a few (one or two) APA format errors.
 

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair
Contains several (three or four) APA format errors.
 

2 to >0 pts

usa nursing papers

Dont wait until the last minute.

Provide your requirements and let our native nursing writers deliver your assignments ASAP.

Poor
Contains many (five or more) APA format errors.
5 pts
Total Points: 100 ANALYSIS OF A PERTINENT HEALTHCARE ISSUE